Club Fyndr is a voice-first AI assistant that unifies email, WhatsApp and calendars, answers calls in a clone of your voice, and drafts replies in your tone. It is pre-launch: access runs through a waitlist, not a checkout.
Used this tool? Rate it
Used this tool? Rate it
Club Fyndr is a voice-first AI coworker: instead of opening each app in turn, you talk, text or call one assistant that reads across your connected inboxes and calendars, decides what matters, and carries out the routine coordination on your behalf. The vendor frames the problem as app-switching, putting the figure at 8 to 12 apps used daily to manage communications and scheduling.
One fact reshapes everything below it: the product is not on sale. The prices, feature list and integration roster describe an intended product, not a shipped one. Read the rest as a specification you are asked to pre-commit to, not a review of software you can try today.
The name misleads. Despite sounding like a venue or community finder, Club Fyndr has nothing to do with discovering clubs or events; it is a communications and scheduling assistant for professionals who live in email, WhatsApp and a calendar.
The most distinctive capability, and the one that carries the most risk, is that the assistant answers your phone in a clone of your own voice. The vendor names ElevenLabs voice cloning as the underlying technology and says the agent handles inbound and outbound calls, booking meetings, answering routine questions, taking messages and escalating when needed.
Building that clone requires handing over a 60-second voice sample, collected specifically to create the personalised voice used by the phone call assistant. That trade is a risk judgement, not a feature comparison: a convincing clone of your voice is a durable asset with uses beyond the ones you intend.
Continuous background scanning is claimed across email, WhatsApp, SMS, calls and messaging platforms, with high-priority items surfaced in one ranked view. The reply layer reads conversation history and drafts responses matched to your tone.
The approval switch is the most consequential setting in the product: it determines whether a hallucinated reply reaches a real recipient before you see it.
Calendar coverage is finite and named: Google Calendar, Microsoft Outlook and Apple Calendar, with nothing beyond those three claimed. Within that boundary the assistant is described as scheduling, rescheduling, resolving conflicts and handling timezones, and as negotiating availability with contacts over WhatsApp and voice calls rather than only writing to your calendar.
That negotiation step distinguishes it from a scheduling-link tool, and means your contacts interact with the agent whether or not they know it.
| Aspect | What the vendor states |
|---|---|
| Message and call volume | No tiered limits on either plan |
| Calendars supported | Google Calendar, Microsoft Outlook, Apple Calendar |
| Voice sample required | 60 seconds |
| Reply approval | Optional; autopilot available |
Neither plan meters volume: the vendor states there are no tiered limits and that ten or ten thousand messages a day are handled alike. Read unmetered claims from a pre-launch product as design intent, not observed capacity: no public deployment exists to check them against.
Setup is described as taking under 15 minutes, spent connecting calendars and uploading that voice sample. The order below follows the vendor's own account of onboarding; each step grants a permission that is easier to give than to take back.
What the product does on your behalf breaks into a handful of jobs, each a question about how much you are willing to delegate.
Each hands a decision to software that the terms elsewhere warn you to check — the trade the product asks you to make.
Because nothing ships yet, the honest fit question is not whether the feature list suits you but whether you are willing to wait and to hand over the access it will need. The audience the vendor names includes founders, freelancers, real estate agents, sales professionals and remote workers.
Two published facts do most of the filtering. Nothing on the site can be bought today: the only call to action published on the marketing page is a waitlist link. The published sitemap runs to ten URLs — the home page, privacy, terms, an AI-crawler file, three markdown mirrors and three blog pages — and contains no signup, login or checkout route. When it does open, two prices are published: ₹1,999 per month, and ₹19,999 per year framed as two months free plus a dedicated account manager and early feature access.
Worth joining the waitlist if:
Probably not, if:
The entry points differ in more than form: each assumes a different amount of attention from you. A native iOS and Android app is positioned as the full dashboard with morning briefing and message review. WhatsApp is the low-friction path, using text or voice notes with no new app to install. The crawler-facing mirror documents the third route as a call placed to the assistant from your own native dialer, pitched at driving or multitasking.
The two official surfaces disagree on how many routes exist. The mirror file lists three; the live home page lists a fourth, Telegram, described as a way to reach tasks, calendar events and email summaries from a Telegram chat. Neither page reconciles the two, so treat the roster as unsettled.
Beyond calendars, the claimed integration surface covers Gmail, Outlook Mail and Yahoo Mail; WhatsApp, Telegram, Slack and SMS; Zoom, Google Meet and Microsoft Teams; plus Google Contacts and CRM platforms. None is individually documented, so treat the list as intent, not verified connectors.
Unusually, the vendor publishes its own stack for the benefit of AI crawlers, naming React and Vite on the front end, Supabase for database, edge functions and authentication, the ElevenLabs voice cloning API, and the Google Calendar and Microsoft Graph APIs for scheduling. That self-disclosure is rare and mildly reassuring, though it says nothing about reliability. It also explains a quirk: the site is a client-rendered single-page app, so human-facing pages return an empty shell to crawlers and the substance lives in machine-readable mirror files.
The published figures are ₹1,999 monthly and ₹19,999 annually. Both are quoted in Indian rupees, and the vendor's own blog republishes the same pair under a heading that reads Club Fyndr Pricing in India.
| Plan | Published price | What is attached |
|---|---|---|
| Monthly | ₹1,999 / month | Full autonomous access, unlimited integrations, voice cloning, priority call routing |
| Annual | ₹19,999 / year | Everything monthly, plus two months free, dedicated account manager, early access |
The arithmetic checks out: twelve months at the monthly rate is ₹23,988, so the annual figure saves ₹3,989, close to two months.
Fees are billed in advance, cancellation only stops future billing, and a no-refund policy applies to partial billing periods. That is a normal SaaS posture, but it weighs more for a product no one has used: the first chance to judge quality arrives after the first payment clears.
The waitlist carries a second track worth noting: a beta option that grants free access ahead of general availability in exchange for shaping the product. That path costs nothing and defers the pricing question entirely.
A roundup by a competing AI assistant vendor puts Reclaim.ai near $10 per month and Motion's Pro AI tier near $19. In the adjacent AI answering category, an affiliate-funded comparison site puts entry pricing at $25 to $49 per month, down from above $200. Neither is an independent test; check both against each vendor's own pricing page.
Club Fyndr's monthly figure sits in similar territory once converted, but the comparison is not like for like: those AI calendar assistant tools ship today and can be trialled, while this one bundles calendar, inbox and call answering into one unreleased subscription. The question is whether one unreleased product should replace two or three working ones.
The terms disclaim liability for four named failure modes rather than generic ones: scheduling errors, conversational hallucinations, missed or miscategorised messages in the unified inbox, and voice clone fidelity varying across call environments. That specificity tells you which failures the vendor expects.
The compliance clause matters if you plan outbound calling. An agent placing calls in a cloned voice sits close to several regulatory lines on consent and disclosure, and the terms put that risk on the account holder, not the vendor.
Message content itself is collected, not merely metadata, because reading correspondence is what makes the unified inbox and the auto-reply feature possible. That is the cost of the product working at all, and a larger grant than most calendar tools ask for.
Four controls are published alongside a bounded deletion window: you can disconnect any integration from the dashboard, revoke calendar or inbox access instantly, delete the account with all associated data, and export your data on request, after which operational data, OAuth tokens and voice profiles are purged within 30 days.
The vendor publishes three credentials, all of them administrative rather than evaluative.
These establish that a registered company exists with institutional support, a real signal pre-launch. None is a product test, a security audit or a customer reference.
No. The product sits behind a waitlist with no purchase path, so the published prices cannot currently be paid. A beta track offers free access ahead of general availability for people willing to test and give feedback.
No, despite the name. It is a voice-first assistant for managing communication, scheduling, reminders and daily workflows, aimed at professionals rather than people looking for venues or social groups.
Two prices are published: ₹1,999 per month and ₹19,999 per year, the latter framed as two months free with a dedicated account manager and early feature access. Both appear only in rupees, and the vendor's blog presents them under an India-specific heading.
A 60-second voice sample, uploaded during setup, which becomes the clone used to answer calls. Total onboarding including calendar connections is described as under 15 minutes.
Calendars are limited to Google Calendar, Microsoft Outlook and Apple Calendar. The claimed messaging surface covers Gmail, Outlook Mail, Yahoo Mail, WhatsApp, Telegram, Slack and SMS, though none of these connectors is individually documented.
You are. The terms assign responsibility for legal compliance of AI-generated calls, messages and automated responses to the user, naming automated dialer regulations, GDPR and communication consent laws, and they disclaim liability for hallucinated content and scheduling errors.
Closure triggers a bounded purge rather than an instant one, with a 30-day window stated for removing operational data, tokens and voice profiles. Until then you retain the ability to disconnect integrations or pull an export.
For Google data specifically the commitment is narrower and more checkable, since the policy adopts the Limited Use requirements and rules out using Google user data for advertising or for training generalized AI models. On storage, the stated measures are AES-256 encryption for personally identifiable database entries, OAuth tokens encrypted at rest, and voice samples kept in isolated encrypted storage. Both policy mirrors carry the same effective and last-updated date of April 12, 2026, and the sitemap repeats that one date, 2026-04-12, as the last-modified value for every one of its ten URLs.
