Gurully is an exam-practice platform offering full-length mock tests with AI scoring for four English proficiency exams. Access is sold as day-limited passes, and the vendor's own terms state a strict zero-refund policy.
Used this tool? Rate it
Used this tool? Rate it
Gurully is an online practice platform for four English proficiency exams: PTE, IELTS, the Duolingo English Test, and CELPIP. Its own positioning is direct — prepare for PTE, IELTS, DET and CELPIP with expert-designed full-length tests, instant AI scoring, and real exam simulations. The product is not a course and not a tutor. It is a simulation environment: you sit a timed mock test that mimics the real exam interface, and the system returns a score with a breakdown.
The legal entity is Gurully Technologies LLP, operating under Indian law with disputes subject to Ahmedabad jurisdiction and the Gujarat High Court. The company's About page describes an origin with two co-founders, Hitesh and Brijesh, starting with PTE and expanding to IELTS in 2020, later adding the Duolingo English Test and CELPIP.
Because this is a product people buy while under real pressure — an immigration or admissions deadline usually sits behind the purchase — this article gives unusual weight to two questions that matter more here than feature lists: whether the score prediction has been independently validated, and what the refund terms actually say. Both answers come from the vendor's own published documents, and both are more restrictive than the marketing pages suggest.
The catalogue entry for this tool carries the title "CELPIP Prep," which understates its scope. The site covers four exams, and CELPIP is one of them rather than the focus. The description otherwise matches what the site delivers.
The central offering is timed, full-length simulation, supported by section-wise tests for targeted practice. The vendor states a bank of more than 30,000 questions and pairs each attempt with in-depth analysis intended to identify weak areas.
Each exam line has its own dedicated area — separate PTE, IELTS, Duolingo, and CELPIP sections — rather than a single generic test engine with different labels.
The terms confirm that the platform uses AI models to evaluate speaking, writing, reading, and listening tasks. That covers all four skills, including the productive ones that are hardest to score automatically.
The exception matters for planning. The official FAQ states that PTE, CELPIP, and DET mock tests mostly return instant results, but IELTS results typically take 24 to 48 hours because the speaking and writing sections are manually evaluated by IELTS experts. So the "instant AI scoring" headline applies fully to three of the four exams; IELTS candidates get human marking on the two subjective sections, with the associated wait. Whether that is a drawback or an advantage depends on your view — human marking on IELTS writing is arguably more trustworthy than automated scoring, but it does break the fast-feedback loop.
One free mock test is offered, and the homepage states no credit card is required. This is a genuinely useful evaluation path given the refund policy discussed below: it is the only risk-free way to assess whether the scoring and interface suit you.
Beyond raw scoring, the platform supplies sample answers to show what a strong response looks like, and PTE predictive questions aimed at pre-exam preparation. Sample answers are the more defensible of the two — seeing a model response is a well-established way to learn assessment criteria. Predictive question sets should be treated with the usual caution that applies to any claim about anticipating exam content.
The terms describe white-label dashboards, partner accounts, and institute panels governed by separate partner agreements, with no ownership of Gurully's content or scoring models transferred. The About page reports over 2,100 partner institutes. This B2B channel is a substantial part of the business even though the consumer site is what most users see.
Official exam fees are substantial and dates are often booked out. Sitting a full-length mock first gives a rough read on readiness. This is the strongest use case, and the free test alone can serve it.
PTE and IELTS run for hours. Reading comprehension under fatigue is a different skill from reading comprehension when fresh. Full-length timed simulation trains that specifically, which section-wise drilling cannot.
Much of the anxiety in computer-delivered exams comes from the mechanics — timers, recording prompts, navigation that will not let you return to earlier questions. Rehearsing the interface removes a category of avoidable errors.
A composite score hides its own weaknesses. Section-level analysis shows whether the shortfall is in speaking fluency or in reading speed, which determines where study time should go.
Someone eligible to take either PTE or IELTS can sit a mock of each and compare relative performance. Different test formats suit different people, and this is a low-cost way to find out which.
Coaching centres use the white-label panels to assign practice, monitor cohorts, and track progress — the reason the platform reports thousands of partner institutes.
This ordering is not a suggestion but a precaution, for a reason set out plainly in the terms: there are no refunds under any circumstances. The free test is the only opportunity to evaluate the platform at zero financial risk. Use it to check that the interface, the audio recording, and the scoring feel usable to you.
The terms are specific: the platform should be accessed on a laptop or desktop using Google Chrome, and a wired headset with a microphone is required for audio recording and evaluation. Other devices and browsers are stated as unsupported and may cause functionality problems. A candidate attempting a speaking mock on a phone or over Bluetooth earbuds may get a poor score from the equipment rather than the English.
Validity begins immediately on purchase and expires automatically, and unused days or attempts cannot be carried forward or compensated. Buying a 60-day pass eight weeks before an exam only makes sense if you will study across those eight weeks. If your intensive period is the final fortnight, a shorter pass bought later wastes nothing.
Full duration, no pauses, no dictionary. A score obtained under relaxed conditions tells you nothing useful about exam day.
The composite number is the least actionable output. The breakdown is what directs study.
Comparing your response against a model answer reveals what the marking rewards — structure, development, specific vocabulary — more efficiently than reading a rubric.
The vendor's own terms state that AI results may not be identical to actual exam scores and should be used only for practice and guidance. Track your trend across attempts rather than fixating on whether a single mock score matches what you would get officially.
A small but irreversible detail: the terms state that once you enter your name when creating an account, it cannot be changed later under any circumstances.
This is the single most important point of interpretation. Gurully's marketing FAQ says its scoring system is designed to closely reflect the actual exam experience. Its Terms and Conditions say something considerably more careful: while Gurully aims to provide the closest possible approximation to official exam scoring, AI results may not be identical to actual exam scores, and they should be used only for practice and guidance.
Both statements are quoted here as published, without attempting to reconcile them. When a vendor's marketing and its legal terms diverge on the same question, the legal text is the more reliable guide to what the company will stand behind. Use the score to measure your own progress over time, not to predict your official result.
Because passes start on purchase and expire regardless of use, and because nothing is refundable, the risk sits entirely with buying too early. Purchase when you are actually ready to study intensively.
The terms are unusually explicit: incorrect selection of package, dissatisfaction, and non-usage all fail to qualify for a refund, and switching between products or packages after purchase is not permitted. Confirm the exam line and duration carefully at checkout.
The homepage displays "Official IDP IELTS Partner" and "DET Gold Partner" badges, both dated from 2025. The Terms and Conditions state that Gurully is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or officially connected to any of these organisations, referring to Pearson, the IELTS partners, Duolingo, and Paragon. These two statements sit uneasily together. If an official affiliation is material to your decision, verify it through the exam board directly rather than relying on either statement here.
Since IELTS speaking and writing are human-marked with a 24 to 48 hour turnaround, plan the feedback loop accordingly and do not expect same-session iteration on those sections.
Once you have taken the free mock test or purchased any package, the terms state the account cannot be deleted, which the company attributes to maintaining platform integrity, scoring data, and internal audit logs. Anyone with data-minimisation concerns should weigh that before signing up.
Self-directed candidates who need volume get a large question bank and repeated full-length simulation at a low per-day cost, which suits people whose main need is practice rather than instruction.
Price-sensitive test takers are well served. Against the cost of an official exam retake, a 30-day pass at 10 to 16 US dollars is a small hedge.
Candidates who need interface rehearsal benefit specifically from simulation of computer-delivered formats.
Coaching institutes are an explicitly served segment via white-label panels and partner accounts.
People deciding between exams can compare their own performance across four formats cheaply.
Anyone who needs teaching rather than testing will find this the wrong tool. It measures and reports; it does not explain grammar or build vocabulary from the ground up.
Candidates wanting a validated score prediction should note that no independent validation exists in the public record, and the vendor's own terms decline to guarantee accuracy.
Users without the required hardware — no laptop, or no wired headset — face a real constraint, since the terms state other setups are unsupported.
Anyone who wants purchase protection should be aware there is none. The zero-refund policy is absolute as written.
Mobile-first users are not the target: the terms direct users to a laptop or desktop with Chrome.
Gurully is a web platform, and the terms are unusually prescriptive about the environment. The stated requirement is a laptop or desktop running Google Chrome, with a wired headset and microphone for audio recording and evaluation. Other devices and browsers are described as unsupported, with possible functionality or performance problems.
The wired-headset requirement deserves emphasis because it directly affects scored output. Speaking sections are evaluated from a recording; Bluetooth latency, compression, or a laptop's built-in microphone can degrade the audio and therefore the score, independently of how well the candidate speaks.
On the exam coverage side, four lines are supported: PTE (Academic and Core), IELTS (computer-delivered), the Duolingo English Test, and CELPIP. Payment is processed through Razorpay, Stripe, or PayTM depending on region. The platform also uses YouTube API Services, so YouTube's terms apply to any embedded video features.
Pricing is time-based rather than usage-based: you buy access for a fixed number of days, not a fixed number of tests.
Structure. Prime Membership passes come in 7, 15, 30, and 60-day durations. Notably, the price differs by exam line.
PTE and Duolingo line: 9 US dollars for 7 days, 12 for 15 days, 16 for 30 days (marked as the popular option), and 26 for 60 days.
IELTS and CELPIP line: 5 US dollars for 7 days, 8 for 15 days, 10 for 30 days, and 15 for 60 days.
Free tier. One free mock test, no credit card required.
Validity rules. Access begins immediately on purchase and expires automatically at the end of the period. Unused days, unused attempts, and inactivity cannot be carried forward or compensated. Subscriptions and test attempts are strictly non-transferable.
Refunds. This is the part to read twice. The terms specify a strict zero-refund policy: no refunds under any circumstances, no cancellations, reversals, or package modifications once a purchase is completed. Incorrect package selection, dissatisfaction, and non-usage are each explicitly excluded as grounds. Switching between products or packages after paying — or after attempting the free test — is not permitted. Where a payment fails but funds are deducted, the terms direct that matter to the payment gateway's own policies rather than to Gurully.
Payment methods. Razorpay, Stripe, and PayTM, depending on region.
Promotions. The site was running a percentage-off discount code during research. Promotional codes have expiry dates, cannot be combined, and may be modified or withdrawn without notice, so treat any specific offer as temporary.
The overall assessment: the absolute prices are low, and for a candidate who will genuinely study during the window, the value is reasonable. The risk is not the amount but the total absence of recourse — every purchase is final, so the free test is the only protection a buyer has.
Official practice materials from the exam boards themselves — Pearson for PTE, the IELTS partners, Duolingo, and Paragon for CELPIP — are the only sources whose scoring is definitionally aligned with the real exam. They typically cost more and offer less volume, but they carry no question about score validity.
E2Language and similar tutor-led services combine practice with instruction and human feedback, at higher cost. Appropriate when the gap is skill rather than familiarity.
PTE Tutorials and APEUni compete directly on PTE practice volume with AI scoring, on comparable low-cost models.
Magoosh and IELTS Liz style resources emphasise instruction and strategy over simulation.
Duolingo's own official practice test is the authoritative option for DET candidates specifically.
The honest framing: this category's differentiators are question volume, price, and interface fidelity — not scoring accuracy, since no third-party platform can validate its scoring against a proprietary official algorithm. Candidates should use third-party tools for practice volume and official materials for calibration.
This is the most consequential limitation and the honest answer to the question most candidates have. No independent audit, correlation study, or third-party validation of Gurully's scoring against official exam outcomes was found in the public record. The vendor publishes its own blog comparison of real exam versus Gurully mock scores, but a vendor evaluating its own accuracy is not independent evidence.
More importantly, the company's own Terms and Conditions decline to claim accuracy: AI results may not be identical to actual exam scores, and should be used only for practice and guidance. Any claim of predictive accuracy for this platform — whether from the marketing FAQ or from third-party blogs — is unverified, and the vendor's legal position is notably weaker than its marketing position.
No refunds under any circumstances. No cancellations, reversals, or modifications after purchase. Wrong package, dissatisfaction, and non-usage are all explicitly non-qualifying. This is unusually restrictive even by the standards of digital subscriptions, and the free mock test is the only pre-purchase protection available.
The site displays "Official IDP IELTS Partner" and "DET Gold Partner" badges from 2025, while section 17 of the Terms states that Gurully is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or officially connected to any of these organisations. Both statements are the company's own. This article reports both verbatim without resolving the contradiction, and recommends verifying with the exam board if the affiliation matters to your decision.
Independent evidence is scarce, and its thinness is itself informative. Trustpilot shows 4.1 stars but across only 22 reviews — a sample far too small to support conclusions about quality, and one where 27% are one-star ratings alongside 64% five-star, indicating a polarised experience. The profile is also flagged as one where the company invites customers to review, and notes the company typically takes over a month to reply to negative reviews.
The AlternativeTo listing was created by co-founder Brijesh Dhanani himself in June 2025 and has attracted zero comments, zero reviews, and zero likes since. That same listing describes the pricing as a one-time perpetual licence of 10 to 30 US dollars, which is factually wrong — the actual model is a day-limited subscription that expires. Third-party directory data should not be relied upon here.
No coverage in established technology media was found. Search results are dominated by the vendor's own blog, including self-authored rankings of "best PTE mock tests," and by a business-directory site that publishes press releases rather than independent editorial. None of this constitutes independent assessment.
The homepage claims 2 million students; the About page says 1 million students and 2,100 institutes. The homepage claims 91 or more countries. The homepage also displays "5.0 stars, 442 reviews" without naming the platform those reviews come from, which sits oddly against the 22 reviews and 4.1 average found on Trustpilot. All these figures are self-reported and unaudited; the internal inconsistency is a reason for additional caution.
The account name cannot be changed after signup under any circumstances. The account cannot be deleted once you have taken the free mock test or bought any package, which the company attributes to platform integrity, scoring data, and audit logs. Subscriptions and attempts are non-transferable.
A laptop or desktop with Chrome and a wired headset is required; other configurations are unsupported. This excludes candidates who study primarily on tablets or phones and adds a small equipment cost for those without a wired headset.
The terms state the company is not responsible for your performance in the official exams, for any academic or immigration outcome, or for indirect damages, and that use of the platform is at your own risk. Standard language, but worth reading given the stakes attached to these particular exams.
Disputes fall under Indian law with Ahmedabad jurisdiction and the Gujarat High Court. For international buyers, pursuing any dispute would be impractical — which, combined with the zero-refund policy, means the practical consumer protection is close to nil.
Not fully. One free mock test is offered with no credit card required, which is genuinely useful for evaluation. Beyond that, access requires a paid pass. Given that no refunds are available under any circumstances, the free test is the only risk-free way to evaluate the platform, and it is worth using before any purchase.
Passes are sold by duration and priced differently by exam. For PTE and Duolingo: 9 US dollars for 7 days, 12 for 15 days, 16 for 30 days, and 26 for 60 days. For IELTS and CELPIP: 5, 8, 10, and 15 US dollars for the same durations. Validity starts immediately on purchase and expires automatically; unused days cannot be carried forward.
There is no independent validation, and the vendor does not guarantee accuracy. Its Terms state that AI results may not be identical to actual exam scores and should be used only for practice and guidance, even though its marketing FAQ says the scoring closely reflects the real exam. No third-party audit or correlation study appears in the public record. Treat the scores as a way to track your own progress rather than as a prediction of your official result.
No. The terms specify a strict zero-refund policy with no refunds under any circumstances and no cancellations or package changes after purchase. Incorrect package selection, dissatisfaction, and non-usage are each explicitly excluded. If a payment fails but money is deducted, that is handled by the payment gateway rather than by Gurully.
Four: PTE (Academic and Core), computer-delivered IELTS, the Duolingo English Test, and CELPIP. Note that the catalogue title "CELPIP Prep" understates this — CELPIP is one of four supported exams, not the sole focus.
PTE, CELPIP, and DET mock tests mostly return instant results. IELTS takes 24 to 48 hours, because the speaking and writing sections are marked by human IELTS experts rather than by AI. So the "instant scoring" claim applies fully to three of the four exam lines.
A laptop or desktop running Google Chrome, plus a wired headset with a microphone for audio recording and evaluation. The terms state that other devices and browsers are not supported and may cause functionality or performance problems. This matters for speaking sections, where poor audio can depress a score independently of speaking ability.
The company's own documents give conflicting answers. The homepage displays "Official IDP IELTS Partner" and "DET Gold Partner" badges dated from 2025, while section 17 of the Terms states Gurully is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or officially connected to any of these organisations, naming Pearson, the IELTS partners, Duolingo, and Paragon. If official affiliation matters to your decision, confirm it with the exam board directly.
Neither, in most cases. The terms state that the name entered at signup cannot be changed later under any circumstances, and that the account cannot be deleted once you have taken the free mock test or purchased any package. The company attributes this to maintaining platform integrity, scoring data, and internal audit logs.
Third-party evidence is thin enough that it cannot support strong conclusions. Trustpilot shows 4.1 across just 22 reviews, with 27% one-star and 64% five-star — a small, polarised sample from a profile that solicits reviews. The AlternativeTo listing was added by a co-founder and has no reviews at all, and it misstates the pricing model. The homepage's own "5.0 stars, 442 reviews" claim does not name its source platform and does not match what independent venues show. No established technology media coverage was found.
