MathGPT is an AI homework solver from MathGPT LLC that turns a photo of a maths, physics, chemistry or accounting problem into step-by-step solutions, animated video explanations, practice quizzes and GeoGebra-powered graphs.
Used this tool? Rate it
Used this tool? Rate it
MathGPT is an AI homework solver aimed at students who are stuck on a specific problem right now. The core interaction is simple and shapes everything else about the product: photograph a question, upload it, and receive a worked solution. The site's own framing is unambiguous about the immediacy on offer — the promise is to "Get instant homework help from your on-demand AI math solver" — and the product is built around that single moment of being stuck rather than around a longer arc of study.
A note on identity before anything else, because this name is genuinely ambiguous. There are several unrelated products called MathGPT, and getting the wrong one is easy. This page describes the product at math-gpt.org, whose operator can be established from app store developer records: the developer is listed as MathGPT LLC, with the seller URL pointing to math-gpt.org. That is the anchor used throughout this page. Distinct products with the same or near-identical name include a separate app from KAIN SUITE PTE. LTD. and another from MSolutions LLC, plus MathGPTPro (now Mathos AI), a different company's product entirely. Anything you read about "MathGPT" that does not trace back to math-gpt.org or MathGPT LLC may well be about something else.
Despite the name, the product is not limited to mathematics. On the site, MathGPT, PhysicsGPT, AccountingGPT and ChemGPT sit as parallel entry points, and the app description adds statistics and engineering to the list. Alongside the solver, the site hosts a Video Gallery, Practice Tests and an AP Exam Hub, which positions it closer to a study platform than to a bare answer engine.
On scale, treat the published figures with care because the vendor's own numbers do not agree with each other. The website states over 2M unique students from 150+ countries, while the app store listing claims Over 15 million students use MathGPT — a difference of more than sevenfold between two channels run by the same company. Neither figure carries an independent audit. This page reports both rather than picking the flattering one.
Step-by-step solutions rather than bare answers: The primary output walks through a problem from start to finish, explaining the reasoning at each stage. The vendor draws the contrast explicitly: "Unlike a basic math calculator, MathGPT functions as your personal math tutor" and solver. Whether that intent survives contact with how students actually use it is a separate question, taken up in Limitations.
AI-generated video explanations, the genuinely unusual feature: For any question, the system can produce a custom animated video. The vendor states that "Video explanations include engaging diagrams, animations, and a comprehensive voiceover" and claims the videos can interpret diagrams from the original problem rather than only narrating text. This is the capability with the least direct competition in the category, and for visual learners it is the reason to choose this tool over a plain solver.
Photo input as the primary entry point: The workflow assumes a phone camera pointed at a textbook or worksheet. This matters more than it sounds: transcribing a complex expression by hand is error-prone and slow, and photo capture is what makes the tool usable in the actual moment of doing homework.
Practice exams that grade themselves: Beyond solving, the app can generate AI powered practice exams that track your progress, provide feedback, and grades your work, with the ability to ask follow-up questions on any item. This is the feature that moves the product from answer supply toward actual practice.
Interactive quizzes and flashcards on any topic: Custom quizzes can be generated for algebra, calculus, physics, chemistry or statistics, adapting to the learner's pace, and a separate flashcard generator produces full sets for any named topic. Together they cover the retrieval-practice side of studying, which is where learning actually consolidates.
Graphing built on established mathematical software: Visualisation is not homegrown — the graphing capability is powered by GeoGebra, a mature open-source mathematics package. This is a meaningful credibility signal, and worth noting that it appears in the app store description rather than on the website's front page.
A broad named calculator library: The product exposes more than a dozen specific calculators including Integral Calculator, Derivative Calculator, Quadratic Calculator, limit, square root, antiderivative, scientific notation, fraction and percentage calculators. Many users arrive through one of these specific needs rather than through the general solver.
Coverage beyond mathematics: The subject range spans statistics, physics, chemistry, accounting, engineering, so a single account covers most of a STEM course load rather than one subject.
Getting unstuck on a single hard problem: The dominant use case and the one the product is designed around. A student working through a problem set hits a wall, photographs the question, and gets a worked solution that shows where their own attempt diverged. The value here is real and immediate — provided the next step is comparing solutions rather than copying one.
Understanding a concept through video rather than text: When a written explanation has already failed twice, an animated video with a voiceover is a genuinely different modality, not just the same content reformatted. This is the strongest argument for this tool over a text-only solver.
Checking your own work before submitting: Solve the problem yourself first, then compare against the tool's solution. This is the usage pattern with the best learning outcome and, not coincidentally, the one least likely to run into academic integrity trouble.
Exam preparation with generated practice: Using the practice test generator and AP Exam Hub to produce fresh problems on a weak topic, then working them under something resembling exam conditions. The self-grading and progress tracking make this viable without a teacher in the loop.
Retrieval practice with quizzes and flashcards: Generating quizzes on a specific chapter or flashcards for a set of definitions. This is the part of the product that supports durable learning most directly, and — given the research covered below — arguably the part students should lean on hardest.
Visualising a function you cannot picture: Using the GeoGebra-backed graphing to see the shape of an equation. Graphing is often the fastest route to intuition for functions, transformations and calculus concepts.
Covering adjacent STEM subjects with one tool: A student taking maths, physics and chemistry simultaneously can use one account across all three rather than assembling three different helpers.
Confirm you are on the right product before creating an account. Given how many tools share this name, check that you are at math-gpt.org and that the app you install is published by MathGPT LLC. This is not pedantry — the alternatives have different owners, different privacy terms and different pricing.
Check your institution's AI policy first, and treat this as a genuine prerequisite. The vendor puts this obligation squarely on you, and the consequences of getting it wrong land on you too. Rules vary enormously between schools, courses and even individual assignments.
Attempt the problem yourself before uploading it. Beyond the integrity question, this is what determines whether you learn anything. A solution you read after your own attempt lands very differently from one you read cold — you know exactly which step you got wrong.
Photograph the question cleanly. Good lighting, the full problem in frame, no adjacent questions cropped in. Photo recognition of mathematical notation is genuinely hard, and a bad capture produces a confidently wrong reading of the problem.
Read the steps rather than jumping to the answer. The step-by-step output is the entire point of using this over a calculator. Skipping to the final line converts a learning tool into an answer service and forfeits the reason to use it.
Verify the result independently. The vendor's own disclaimer requires this. Check the answer by substitution, by estimation, or against the back of the book. This step is not optional and takes less time than it saves.
Generate a video when the written steps do not land. If you have read the steps twice and still cannot see why one follows another, this is exactly what the video explanation is for. Use it as the second attempt at understanding, not the first.
Consolidate with a quiz on the same topic. After understanding one problem, generate practice questions on that concept and work them without assistance. This is the step that converts a solved problem into retained knowledge, and it is the step almost everyone skips.
Use it as a checker, not as a first resort. The single behavioural difference that separates students who learn from this category of tool from those who do not is whether the tool comes before or after their own attempt. The research covered in Limitations makes this more than a platitude.
Never submit a generated solution as your own work. The vendor's terms explicitly prohibit using the service to violate academic integrity rules, and enforcement falls to your institution, which has its own detection methods and its own penalties.
Sanity-check every numerical answer. Estimate the magnitude before you look, and see whether the answer is plausible. AI solvers fail in ways that are easy to catch this way — a sign error or a misread exponent produces an answer that is obviously wrong to anyone who paused to think.
Re-photograph when the tool has misread the problem. If the restated question does not match what is on your page, the solution that follows is worthless regardless of how confident it sounds. Check the transcription first, every time.
Prefer the quiz and flashcard tools when you are studying rather than finishing. These build retrieval strength. The solver, used alone, does not.
Ask follow-up questions on the step you did not understand. The conversational interface means you can interrogate a single line rather than regenerating the whole solution. This is underused and is where most of the tutoring value actually sits.
Do not treat the video explanation as passive viewing. Pause it, predict the next step, then continue. Watching an explanation feels like learning while producing very little of it.
Keep a note of what you got wrong, not just what you got right. The practice test progress tracking helps, but a personal list of recurring error types is more useful than an aggregate score for knowing what to revise.
Secondary and university students in STEM courses: The core audience. The subject range and the difficulty span, from basic algebra through calculus, map onto a typical school and undergraduate load.
Students preparing for standardised exams: The AP Exam Hub and practice test generator address this scenario specifically rather than incidentally.
Visual learners who struggle with written explanations: The animated video explanations are the strongest reason to pick this product over alternatives, and this is the group they serve best.
Students working without access to tutoring: For learners without a teacher, tutor or study group available at the moment of being stuck, the availability argument is genuine.
Adult learners returning to study: Someone revisiting maths years after school often needs concept-level explanation rather than just an answer, and the step-by-step plus video combination suits that.
Parents helping with homework: Adults who cannot remember a method themselves can use the worked steps to help rather than to substitute.
Who it is not for: Anyone under 13, who is excluded by the terms; students whose institution prohibits AI assistance on the work in question; and non-English speakers relying on the mobile app, for reasons covered under Platforms.
Web application: The primary surface at math-gpt.org, with the subject-specific entry points, video gallery, practice tests and exam hub.
iOS application: Published by MathGPT LLC. The iOS app first shipped in November 2024 and was still being updated in August 2026, indicating active maintenance rather than an abandoned listing. It holds a 4.85 average across 5,237 ratings and carries a 4+ content rating.
Android application: Also from MathGPT LLC, with 500K+ downloads on the Android side, a 4.5 average across 16.1K reviews, an Everyone content rating, and a stated commitment to the store's families policy.
Language support is a real constraint: the mobile app lists English as its only supported language, which sits awkwardly against a claimed presence in more than 150 countries. Students studying in another language should test the web experience before relying on it.
Free to install, paid inside: On both stores the app itself is a free download with In-app purchases, so the download price tells you nothing about the eventual cost.
This section is shorter than it should be, and the reason is worth stating plainly: the only named paid tier is MathGPT Unlimited, and no price figure, billing period length or usage quota appears anywhere on the public site. The pricing page carries no visible pricing, and the fulfilment policy names the tier without attaching a number to it. This page therefore does not quote a price. Any figure you find elsewhere for this product should be checked against the current in-product checkout, since it did not come from the vendor's public pages.
What the public terms do state clearly is the refund position, and it is unusually strict. The terms of service provide that "All fees and charges are non-refundable, non-cancelable, and non-creditable" including software, subscriptions, credits, partially used billing periods and unused features, except where law requires otherwise. The fulfilment policy repeats this — payments are non-refundable and non-creditable, including partially used billing periods and unused features — and explicitly extends it to technical problems, service interruptions, dissatisfaction and cancellations made after a charge has been taken. Cancellation itself is straightforward and can be done through account settings, the billing portal or the app store used for purchase, and your access continues through the current billing cycle, and no future charges will apply.
The practical implication for a student on a limited budget is specific: because there is no published price and no refund route, work out what you are being charged at the checkout screen, and treat each billing period as a committed spend rather than something you can unwind if the tool disappoints.
The AI maths solver category is crowded and the alternatives divide along a useful line. Photomath and Mathway are the long-established photo-solving incumbents with very large review bases; they are more proven on recognition accuracy and step quality but do not offer generated video explanations. Symbolab and Wolfram Alpha sit on the computational side — Wolfram Alpha in particular is a genuine computation engine rather than a language model, which makes it far more reliable for pure calculation while offering much less in the way of pedagogical explanation.
General-purpose assistants such as ChatGPT, Claude and Gemini will handle many of these problems and cost about the same, but they lack the purpose-built structure: no photo-first workflow tuned to notation, no practice test generation, no graphing integration. Against same-named products, the comparison is not really a comparison — MathGPTPro/Mathos AI and the various other MathGPT apps are separate products from separate companies, and choosing between them requires first establishing which one you are looking at.
The honest summary: pick this one for the video explanations and the breadth of study tools around the solver. Pick an incumbent if raw recognition reliability matters most. Pick a computation engine if you need an answer you can trust without checking.
The vendor tells you the output may be wrong, in three separate places. The front page carries the notice "MathGPT can make mistakes. Please double check important steps and calculations". The terms go further: "The Service may generate incorrect, incomplete, or misleading content", and the company does not warrant that the Service will produce accurate or complete results. For a maths tool this deserves emphasis, because a wrong answer that looks correct and shows plausible working is harder to catch than an obvious failure — and a student who has memorised a wrong method carries the error into the exam.
Academic integrity risk is transferred entirely to the student. The terms state that "You are responsible for complying with your institution's academic integrity policies" and any other rules applying to AI tool use, and separately prohibit "violating academic integrity rules, testing rules, or another person's rights". This is a legally coherent position, but it means the product offers no guardrails, no honour-code prompts and no institution-facing controls. The line between legitimate help and misconduct is drawn by your school, and the consequences of misjudging it fall on you.
Independent research suggests this category can reduce learning, not just accelerate it. This is the most important thing on this page and it is not a matter of opinion. A quasi-experimental study drawing on 3.2 million ALEKS learning interactions across a ten-year panel found that after generative AI became widely available, study time on AI-vulnerable problems fell by 26.9% cumulatively for college students over eleven quarters. The decisive finding is what happened under supervision: the same work produced a 25% cumulative decline in correct responses in proctored conditions, indicating that students had built less knowledge rather than working more efficiently. This research addresses the category rather than this specific product, but the product's core proposition — an instant worked solution on demand — is precisely the mechanism being studied. It is the strongest available argument for the check-your-work usage pattern recommended above.
Store ratings diverge more than usual between platforms. The product holds 4.5 stars across 16.1K reviews on Google Play against 4.85 across 5,237 ratings on the App Store. The Android sample is roughly three times larger and the score meaningfully lower, so the more favourable iOS figure should not be read as the product's overall standing.
The vendor's scale claims contradict each other. Two figures from the same company differ by more than sevenfold, as noted above. Neither is audited. This does not make the product bad, but it does mean its self-reported numbers carry little evidential weight.
Same-name confusion has already produced published errors. This is not hypothetical: one major AI directory lists a MathGPT entry that actually describes MathGPTPro, a different company's Chrome extension, complete with that company's accuracy claims. Reviews, comparisons and ratings you find under this name may not describe this product at all.
Mobile language support is English only. For a product claiming users in over 150 countries, a single-language mobile app is a significant gap, particularly since photo-based homework help is most valuable on a phone.
No independent media coverage of this specific product could be found. Searching produced only affiliate-style listicles, competitor comparison pages and the vendor's own blog. The absence of scrutiny is itself information: no journalist appears to have independently tested this product's accuracy, which means the accuracy claims rest on the vendor's word and on store reviews.
Because the users here are mostly minors uploading photographs of their schoolwork, the data terms deserve a closer read than they usually get — and this section reports what the policies say, including where they say nothing.
The minimum age is thirteen, stated consistently. The terms provide that "You must be at least 13 years old to use the Service", with parental consent additionally required for users below the age of majority. The privacy policy matches: the service is not intended for children under 13, and children under 13 may not use the Service, with the company stating it does not knowingly collect personal information from that age group.
COPPA is not mentioned. The privacy policy sets a 13-year threshold but does not reference the children's privacy regulation by name or claim compliance with it. A minimum-age rule and a compliance statement are not the same thing, and this page will not treat one as the other.
Whether your data trains AI models is not addressed. The privacy policy contains no statement about whether user content is used to train, fine-tune or improve AI models. For a product whose input is photographs of a student's own work, this is a substantive gap. If the answer matters to you or to your child's school, ask the company directly rather than assuming a default in either direction.
No AI providers or subprocessors are named. The policy does not disclose which model vendors process uploaded content. Despite the GPT branding across the product line, nothing on the site establishes a relationship with any particular AI provider, and the naming should not be read as one.
Retention has no stated ceiling. The policy says the company will retain information for as long as reasonably necessary to provide the Service, with retention potentially continuing after account deletion for legal, security, fraud-prevention, tax, accounting, backup or dispute-resolution purposes. That is a common formulation, but it is materially weaker than a specific number of days.
The app stores disclose more than the privacy policy does. The Android listing's data safety section states the app may collect Personal info, Financial info and 3 others, and may share device or other identifiers with third parties. It also confirms that Data is encrypted in transit and users can request that data be deleted, and that the developer commits to the store's families policy. That financial information appears in the collected categories is expected for a paid app but is not spelled out with the same clarity in the policy text itself.
What to check yourself. If a school or parent is evaluating this, the questions worth asking the vendor in writing are: whether uploaded homework images are used for model training, which AI providers process them, how long images are retained specifically, and whether any student-specific deletion guarantee exists beyond the general request mechanism.
This page covers the product at math-gpt.org, operated by MathGPT LLC — verifiable because the app store developer record for its apps lists math-gpt.org as the seller URL. Several unrelated products share the name, including apps from KAIN SUITE PTE. LTD. and MSolutions LLC, and MathGPTPro (now Mathos AI) from another company entirely. Check the domain and the developer name before signing up or paying.
The public site does not say. The only named paid tier is MathGPT Unlimited, and no price, billing period or quota appears on the pricing or fulfilment pages. The apps are free to download with in-app purchases. You will see the actual figure at checkout, and because of the refund policy you should treat that figure as a committed spend.
Effectively no. The terms state that all fees are non-refundable, non-cancelable and non-creditable except where law requires otherwise, and the fulfilment policy extends this explicitly to technical issues, service interruptions, dissatisfaction and post-charge cancellations. You can cancel future billing at any time and keep access until the current cycle ends.
That depends entirely on your institution's rules and on the assignment, and the vendor makes clear the responsibility is yours: the terms require you to comply with your institution's academic integrity policies and prohibit using the service to violate academic integrity or testing rules. Using it to check work you have already attempted is generally defensible; submitting a generated solution as your own is not.
Not guaranteed. The site itself warns that MathGPT can make mistakes and asks users to double-check important steps and calculations, while the terms state the service may generate incorrect, incomplete or misleading content and offer no warranty of accuracy. Verify every answer independently, especially before it goes into submitted work.
Both are possible and the difference is behavioural. Independent research covering this category — based on 3.2 million learning interactions over a ten-year panel — found study time on AI-vulnerable problems dropped 26.9% for college students, with a 25% cumulative decline in correct responses under proctored conditions, meaning less knowledge was built. Attempting problems first and using the tool to check is the pattern that avoids this outcome.
Thirteen. The terms require users to be at least 13, with parental consent additionally needed for anyone below the age of majority, and the privacy policy states the service is not intended for and may not be used by children under 13.
The privacy policy does not say, in either direction, and no AI providers or subprocessors are named anywhere in it. If this matters for you or your school, ask the company directly and get the answer in writing rather than inferring it.
Yes. The site provides parallel entry points for physics, chemistry and accounting alongside maths, and the app description adds statistics and engineering. The graphing feature is powered by GeoGebra, and there is a substantial library of named calculators covering integrals, derivatives, limits and more.
There are iOS and Android apps from MathGPT LLC, rated 4.85 across 5,237 ratings and 4.5 across 16.1K reviews respectively, with more than 500,000 Android downloads. However the mobile app lists English as its only supported language, so if you study in another language, test the web version before relying on the app.
