iMyFone is a consumer software vendor whose catalogue spans iPhone and Android data recovery, screen and Apple ID unlocking, iOS system repair, chat-history transfer, and video editing, all sold as separate Windows and macOS desktop licences.
Used this tool? Rate it
Used this tool? Rate it
iMyFone is not a single application. It is a consumer software vendor rather than a single application, and the name on the website is a catalogue brand covering more than a dozen separately licensed desktop programs. The company describes itself as offering solutions to iOS and Android devices, Windows PCs and Macs, and its own corporate page states it was founded in May 2015 as a global technology company specializing in consumer software development and promotion. Anyone arriving at imyfone.com expecting one tool with one price will instead find a store front listing Fixppo, D-Back, LockWiper, AnyTo, iMyTrans, ChatsBack, MirrorTo, UltraRepair, Filme, MarkGo and AnySmall, each sold on its own licence.
The problems these programs address share a family resemblance: a phone or a computer has stopped cooperating, and the data inside it is either unreachable or already gone. Photos deleted without a backup. An iPhone stuck in a boot loop after a failed update. A screen passcode nobody remembers. A WhatsApp history that has to survive a move from Android to iOS. A video file that will not play. Each of these has its own dedicated product in the catalogue, and the practical consequence for a buyer is that solving two adjacent problems usually means paying twice.
Positioning matters here because the category is crowded and the marketing conventions are loose. iMyFone competes with EaseUS, Wondershare Dr.Fone, Tenorshare and a long tail of smaller vendors, all of whom publish similar success-rate figures and similar media badge walls. What separates a considered purchase from a regretted one is usually not the feature list but the fine print: what the refund policy actually covers, whether the tool runs on your operating system, and whether the specific lock or file type you are facing is genuinely in scope. This page concentrates on those details.
One further identity fact is worth stating plainly, because it does not appear on any product page. The footer of the company profile discloses the operating entity as CLEVERGUARD TECHNOLOGY CO., LIMITED, a Hong Kong registered entity with registration number 72039776, alongside a London address presented as a European office. A third-party directory listing associates the brand with the Chinese name 麦风科技 and carries a third-party directory estimate of roughly 2.6 million monthly visitors, which should be read as an estimate rather than a measured figure.
Every product offers a free trial, and the trial is functionally a diagnostic rather than a usable free tier — it scans and previews but does not complete the recovery or repair. Paid licences are sold per product at published prices, which is worth noting because a meaningful share of this category hides pricing behind a quote form. Representative figures from the official store include Fixppo listed at $29.99 against a $49.99 reference price, D-Back at $49.99 against $69.99, and AnyTo at $14.99 against $19.99. Smaller utilities sit lower — MarkGo at $7.95 and MirrorTo at $9.99 against their own reference prices.
Two structural observations should shape expectations. First, every product on the store displays a discounted price against a struck-through original, and this appears to be the permanent presentation rather than a time-limited promotion, so the reference prices are best read as anchors rather than as prices anyone pays. Second, bundling is where the arithmetic changes: a six-in-one bundle of one-year plans at $129.95 against a $369.70 list price covers LockWiper, Fixppo, D-Back, iTransor, Umate Pro and Filme together. Whether that is a saving depends entirely on how many of the six you would otherwise buy.
The refund policy deserves as much attention as the price. It advertises a 30-day money-back guarantee, and it grants refunds for genuine technical failures, duplicate purchases, payment platform errors and unnotified auto-renewals. What it excludes is equally specific: buying the wrong program, downloading the wrong version, changing your mind after purchase, the product not meeting personal expectations, and requests made for no stated reason. Once a refund is issued the licence is deactivated and the software must be uninstalled. Read together with the trial, the intended flow is clear — the vendor expects you to qualify the purchase before making it, and the guarantee does not substitute for having done so.
Independent verification is thinner than the badge wall suggests. The company states it has been reported by more than 120 high-authority media outlets, and its testimonials page displays a wall of publisher logos under the heading of trusted media. Checking one of the most prominent of those citations directly is instructive: the Macworld article the vendor quotes carries a BrandPost label reading Sponsored by In association with iMyFone, dated March 2020 and published without a journalist's byline. That is paid placement, not editorial assessment. A search restricted to established technology publications returned how-to articles and publisher-shop listings rather than bylined reviews with independent testing. The absence of such coverage is itself a finding.
The user rating is strong but carries a structural caveat. On Trustpilot the vendor holds 4.6 out of 5 across 8,053 reviews, with 83% five-star and 9% one-star — a sample large enough to be meaningful. However, Trustpilot labels iMyFone as a company that invites its customers to review, and the platform states plainly that offering incentives or asking selectively can bias the score. The rating should be read as a real signal about a real customer base, with that solicitation caveat attached.
Refunds are the recurring complaint. The platform's own review summary reports difficulties regarding refunds, with mentions of the company resisting full refunds or granting only partial amounts, alongside reports that support responses were not always immediately helpful or lacked follow-up. This is not merely user grievance: the official refund policy corroborates it structurally, since the excluded categories cover most of the situations in which an ordinary buyer would want their money back.
The legal footprint does not match the marketing geography. The company page presents a London address as a European office. Checking the registration number it publishes against the UK register shows that the UK entity behind that London address is filed at Companies House under SIC code 99999 - Dormant Company. The entity is active as a registration, but a dormant filing is not the profile of a functioning European operation, and buyers who assumed local establishment for support or consumer-law purposes should adjust that assumption.
Contractual protection is minimal. The licence agreement disclaims all warranties in the strongest available terms, states that the entire risk as to the quality and performance of the software is borne by the user, and accepts no responsibility for damage arising from incorrect use. Personal licences are revocable, non-transferable and barred from commercial use.
Ownership verification is left to the user. For a vendor selling tools that bypass Apple ID and MDM enrolment, this is the most consequential gap. The licence agreement prohibits use that violates local law or infringes any party's rights, but does not impose any explicit requirement that you be the lawful owner of the device, and the software performs no verification of its own. The obligation to establish that a device is legitimately yours rests entirely with you.
Location spoofing carries policy risk the marketing understates. Changing reported GPS coordinates conflicts with the terms of service of the location-based games these tools are principally marketed toward, and anti-cheat detection in that space has become progressively more sophisticated. Themes that recur across user discussion are that no method is reliably undetectable and that account restrictions remain possible; the vendor's own anti-detection claims are vendor statements and are not independently verified here.
Business-platform coverage is negligible. There are only four verified reviews on G2, far below the sample size at which a rating carries information. This is consistent with a consumer-focused vendor, but it means buyers cannot triangulate the Trustpilot picture against a second substantial dataset.
Privacy documentation is thin. The policy lists the personal data collected — name, email, mailing address, phone number and card details — and commits not to sell personal information. It makes no statement about GDPR or CCPA data-subject rights and specifies no retention period. It also notes that when uploading to YouTube through its software, Google's privacy policy applies instead of iMyFone's own.
Marketing pages are not consistently maintained. The company profile simultaneously states a May 2015 founding and seven years of experience, which cannot both be current. It is a small thing, but it calibrates how much weight the surrounding self-reported figures deserve.
Many. The brand covers more than a dozen separately licensed products spanning data recovery, system repair, device unlocking, chat transfer and media editing. Each is bought individually, which means solving two related problems usually costs twice. Identify the specific product that matches your situation before purchasing, since buying the wrong program is explicitly excluded from the refund policy.
You can find out whether recovery is possible without paying. The free trial scans the device and previews recoverable files, but completing the recovery requires a licence. Treat this as the intended qualification step: if your files do not appear in the preview, purchasing will not make them appear.
No. These are Windows and macOS desktop programs, and the phone connects by cable as the subject of the operation. A lookup against Apple's official metadata API returned no matching iOS applications, which is consistent with that architecture. If you need a fix that runs entirely on the handset, this catalogue does not provide one.
It covers genuine technical failures where no solution was provided within 30 days, duplicate purchases, payment platform errors and certain auto-renewal situations. It explicitly does not cover buying the wrong program, downloading the wrong version, changing your mind, the product not meeting your expectations, or requests made without a reason. Refund complaints are the most common recurring theme in user reviews, and this narrow scope is the structural reason why.
It is a vendor claim published without a stated methodology or sample, so it should not be read as a measured result. Actual recovery odds depend mainly on how much the device has been written to since the data was lost, which no software controls. The preview in the trial is a far more reliable predictor for your specific case than any published rate.
That depends on the device's provenance, and the software will not decide it for you. The licence agreement prohibits use that violates local law or infringes any party's rights, but sets no explicit ownership requirement and performs no verification. Removing locks from a device you do not own may constitute an offence in your jurisdiction. Establish ownership before proceeding, and be aware that carrier and activation locks tied to remote services may be outside the software's reach regardless.
The standard repair mode is designed to preserve data, and it is the one to try first. Advanced Mode repairs will result in data loss — that caveat appears even in the vendor's own sponsored coverage. Some complex faults also require placing the device into recovery or DFU mode before it can be detected at all. Back up whatever is still accessible before starting any repair.
Yes, that risk is real. Location spoofing conflicts with the terms of service of the games these tools target, and anti-cheat systems in that space have grown more sophisticated over time. The recurring theme in user discussion is that no approach is reliably undetectable and account restrictions remain possible. The vendor's anti-detection claims are its own statements and are not independently verified.
Not under a personal licence. The agreement grants a revocable, personal, non-exclusive and non-transferable right, and bars use for commercial or financial gain including the performance of technical or consulting services. Rights cannot be transferred without written consent. Commercial operators need to arrange appropriate licensing with the vendor rather than relying on retail purchases.
Treat them cautiously. At least one prominently quoted Macworld piece is labelled BrandPost and marked as sponsored in association with iMyFone, meaning it is paid placement rather than independent review. A search restricted to established technology publications did not surface bylined, independently tested reviews. The substantial Trustpilot dataset is more informative, provided you weigh it alongside the platform's note that this company solicits reviews from its customers.
