Toolso.AI
Toolso.AI
All ToolsCategoriesTrendingLatest ToolsPricingBlog
Toolso.AI
Toolso.AI
Toolso.AI
Toolso.AI

Discover the best AI tools to boost your productivity

GitHubGitHubTwitterX (Twitter)YouTubeYouTubeTikTokEmail

Popular Categories

  • AI Writing
  • AI Image
  • AI Video
  • AI Coding
  • More Categories

Explore

  • Latest Tools
  • Popular Tools
  • More Tools
  • Submit Tool
  • Pricing

About

  • About Us
  • Contact
  • Blog
  • Changelog

Legal

  • Cookie Policy
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  • Refund Policy
© 2026 Toolso.AI All Rights Reserved
Limited timeLimited-time offerFeatured Listing24h priority review · No backlink · 30 days featured$29.90then $59.90Price rises to $59.90 after Oct 31Ends in--:--:--Submit now
  1. Home
  2. All Tools
  3. Image Editing
  4. HitPaw
HitPaw interface preview
HitPaw logo

HitPaw

HitPaw is a Hong Kong software brand selling a matrix of separately licensed desktop and mobile AI tools for video, photo and audio — upscaling to 4K and 8K, format conversion, real-time voice changing and object removal, each bought on its own.

Image EditingVideo EditingAudio Tool#Voice Cloning#Background Removal#Batch Processing
Try for Free
Saves
Visits
Views
Pricing
Freemium
Published
Aug 22, 2026
Domain
hitpaw.com
Community rating

Used this tool? Rate it

Rate this tool

HitPaw Product Information

Try for Free
Tool Information
Saves
Visits
Views
Pricing
Freemium
Published
Aug 22, 2026
Domain
hitpaw.com
Community rating

Used this tool? Rate it

Rate this tool

Featured Tools

Related Tools

Try for Free

What is HitPaw?

HitPaw is not one application. It is a brand covering a matrix of separately sold desktop and mobile tools for media enhancement — video upscaling, photo repair, format conversion, voice changing, object removal and video editing — each licensed on its own. Understanding that structure first will save you money, because the natural assumption that buying "HitPaw" gets you the whole toolkit is wrong.

The privacy policy names the operating entity plainly: the products are provided by HitPaw CO., LIMITED, a company registered in Tsuen Wan, Hong Kong. This matters because the brand is sometimes assumed to belong to a larger Chinese software group; no first-hand evidence supports that. The privacy policy, the Apple App Store publisher record and the company's own profile on review platforms all point to the same independent entity.

The product line was renamed: what directories still list as HitPaw Video Enhancer is now VikPea, the photo tool is FotorPea, the voice tool is VoicePea, and the converter is Univd. Anyone searching for the older names will find pages that redirect or read as legacy, and comparison articles written before the change describe products under names the site no longer uses.

The company describes itself as founded in 2019, with a team of more than 150 engineers. Its market position is the accessible end of media enhancement: one-click results for people who do not want to learn a professional editing suite.

Core Features

  • AI video upscaling (VikPea): VikPea is the AI video enhancer at the centre of the range, advertised as taking 480p, 720p and 1080p footage up to 4K and 8K while preserving realistic detail, with separate models for noise, blur and damaged footage. It also claims frame-rate interpolation up to 60 FPS and stabilisation for shaky action-camera clips.
  • Enhancement of AI-generated video: A notable shift in positioning is that the company now markets enhancement of AI-generated video from Kling, Sora, Veo and Seedance as a first-class use case. This is a sensible niche — current generative video models output at limited resolution, and upscaling is a real gap in that workflow.
  • AI photo enhancement (FotorPea): Positioned as an all-in-one photo enhancer and editor, focused on removing blur, lifting quality and reviving detail in low-resolution or poorly lit images, with batch handling aimed at photographers and e-commerce sellers.
  • Real-time voice changing (VoicePea): VoicePea is a real-time voice changer advertised with more than 200 character voices, aimed at gamers, streamers and meetings rather than at video post-production. It is the product in the matrix least related to the others.
  • Format conversion and compression (Univd): This video converter is marketed on speed — conversion described as up to 170 times faster — alongside compression that the company says preserves quality. This is the most conventional utility in the range and the least dependent on AI claims.
  • Object and watermark removal: Separate products handle removing objects and backgrounds from video and from photos. These are sold individually rather than bundled into the enhancers.
  • Video translation and editing: The matrix extends to BlipCut for video translation, subtitles and dubbing across more than 130 languages, an AI audio enhancer for noise removal, and Edimakor, a fuller video editor with auto-cut, filters and effects.

Use Cases

  1. Rescuing old family or archive footage: The clearest fit. Low-resolution, noisy or damaged video is exactly what the upscaling models are trained for, and the one-click workflow suits people who will do this once and never open the software again. Results vary by source quality, and heavily degraded footage will still look processed.
  2. Post-processing AI-generated clips: Generative video tools output at resolutions below what a client or a platform expects. Upscaling that output is a genuine workflow gap, and the company has explicitly built for it.
  3. Batch-preparing e-commerce product images: For sellers with hundreds of listing photos, batch enhancement is a real time saver relative to manual editing. This is the use case where the value is easiest to quantify.
  4. Quick format conversion for multi-platform publishing: Creators delivering the same video to several platforms need format and compression work that does not merit a professional encoder. Univd covers this without an AI premium attached.
  5. Voice changing for streaming and gaming: A separate audience entirely — real-time character voices for live use rather than for produced media. Anyone buying the brand for video will not get this, and vice versa.
  6. Localising video for other markets: Automated subtitling and dubbing across many languages suits creators expanding reach who cannot fund human localisation for every clip. Treat machine dubbing quality as needing review before publication.

How to use HitPaw

  1. Identify the specific product you need, not the brand. Each product is bought separately, and each is sold in three shapes at once: a monthly plan, a yearly plan, and a perpetual licence. Buying the wrong one of the seven-plus tools is a real risk.
  2. Download the free trial for that product. Trials generally allow processing but restrict export or add limits, so use the trial to test whether the model handles your specific footage rather than to finish work.
  3. Test on your worst source material first. Enhancement quality is entirely dependent on the input. A model that transforms one clip may leave another looking waxy or over-sharpened. Your hardest file is the honest test.
  4. Check whether the feature you want consumes credits. Some AI models draw on a credit balance separate from the licence. Confirm this before purchase, not after — it is the single most common complaint from buyers.
  5. Apply the current discount code. The store almost always carries a promotion; the listed price is rarely the transacting price.
  6. Choose perpetual versus subscription deliberately. For a one-off archive project, a perpetual licence for a single product often costs less than a year of subscription. For ongoing work across several tools, the maths changes.
  7. Keep your purchase records and test immediately. Given the refund friction reported by buyers, verifying that the feature you paid for actually works within the first days is worth doing deliberately.

Tips & Best Practices

  • Match the model to the footage, not to the marketing. These tools ship several enhancement models with different training targets — faces, animation, general footage. Using the wrong one produces the plastic look that gives AI upscaling a bad name.
  • Do not upscale beyond what the source supports. Taking 480p to 8K is technically offered and rarely wise. Detail that was never captured is invented, and the invention shows on large screens.
  • Budget processing time on heavy models. High-quality enhancement on long footage is slow on consumer hardware. Test a 30-second segment before committing an hour-long file overnight.
  • Verify the export before you assume success. Buyers repeatedly report processing that appears to run but never completes an export. Confirm you get a usable output file early in the trial.
  • Treat the vendor's own review pages as marketing. The site publishes review-styled pages about its own products under its own domain. These are not independent assessments regardless of how they are formatted.
  • Compare against a general editor before buying several tools. If you need three or four of these products, a single subscription to a full editing suite may cost less and consolidate the workflow.
  • Read the current refund policy before purchase. Refund terms and the practical experience of claiming one are the areas where this brand draws the most criticism, so know the stated terms in advance.

Who is HitPaw for?

  • Casual users with a specific one-off job: Someone restoring a wedding video or a box of scanned photos, who wants a result without learning professional software.
  • Content creators needing fast turnaround: Users publishing across platforms who value one-click processing over granular control.
  • E-commerce sellers with image volume: The batch use case where time saved is directly measurable.
  • AI video creators needing higher resolution: A newer and genuinely well-served audience, given the resolution limits of current generative models.
  • Streamers and gamers: A separate audience for the voice product specifically.

Who it is not for: professional colourists and editors who need frame-level control; anyone requiring guaranteed, predictable output for client work; buyers who dislike per-product licensing; and organisations needing documented enterprise support.

Platforms

  • Windows and macOS desktop: The primary environment, where the heavier enhancement models run locally.
  • Web browser: Online versions exist for the photo and video enhancers, useful for quick jobs without installation, generally with tighter limits than desktop.
  • iOS and Android: The download matrix for the video enhancer covers Windows, Mac, a browser version, iPhone and iPad, and Android. Mobile apps are separate products in the app stores rather than companions to a desktop licence.
  • App Store presence: The video enhancer app carries a 4.19 average across 104 ratings and a 4+ age rating. The same publisher's photo editing app carries a 4.0 average from 1,868 ratings and, notably, a 17+ age rating, while the video enhancer app is rated 4+.

That age-rating gap is worth a note for anyone deploying these tools in a school or family context: the company has not explained publicly why its photo editing app carries the higher rating, and the discrepancy is recorded here as fact rather than interpreted.

Pricing & Plans

The structure matters more than any individual number. There is no single HitPaw subscription. Each tool has its own price and its own choice of monthly, annual or perpetual licence, so a user wanting video upscaling, photo enhancement and format conversion is making three purchases.

At the time of checking, the store listed the video enhancer at roughly $54 for a year or $88 for a perpetual licence, the photo enhancer in the low twenties, the converter and the video editor around $20, and the object removers considerably higher. Every one of these was a promotional price shown against a struck-through original, with an additional site-wide discount code layered on top. The practical implication is that the list price is not the real price and there is little reason to ever pay it. A 30% education discount is also offered through a student verification partner.

One structural warning deserves prominence because it is the most common substantive complaint from buyers. A recurring complaint is that some AI models consume a separate credit balance on top of the licence you already bought, a requirement buyers report was not made clear at purchase. If a specific AI model is why you are buying, confirm in writing whether using it draws on credits and what those credits cost.

Free trials exist for the desktop products, and the mobile apps are free to download with paid unlocks.

Alternatives

  • Topaz Video AI / Photo AI: The reference point at the professional end of AI enhancement, with stronger model quality and far higher prices, aimed at users who will tune parameters rather than click once.
  • Adobe Creative Cloud: If you need several of these capabilities plus real editing control, a single Adobe subscription consolidates video, photo and audio work, at ongoing cost and with a steeper learning curve.
  • DaVinci Resolve: A free professional editor with strong colour and increasingly capable AI features, appropriate for users willing to invest learning time instead of money.
  • HandBrake: Free and open source for the conversion and compression use case specifically, removing any reason to pay for that function alone.
  • Wondershare products: A comparable consumer-focused Chinese software line with a similar per-product structure, often the direct comparison a shopper is making. Note that despite occasional assumptions to the contrary, these are separate companies.

Limitations & Considerations

  • Trustpilot has suppressed the company's rating for a guidelines breach. Trustpilot has suppressed the company's score outright, stating that the rating is unavailable due to a breach of its guidelines. This is not an absence of data — there are 2,716 reviews on the page — but a platform decision to withhold the aggregate score.
  • The platform states it removed fake reviews for this company. The platform goes further and states that it has removed a number of fake reviews for this company, which is a public finding of review manipulation rather than an inference. Any positive rating for this brand encountered elsewhere should be weighed against that finding.
  • The review distribution is unusually polarised. The distribution across 2,716 reviews is strikingly polarised: 81% five-star against 16% one-star, with almost nothing in between. Distributions shaped like this — with a hollow middle — are a recognised signature of mixed genuine and solicited feedback, and warrant reading the one-star reviews specifically rather than the average.
  • Credits on top of the licence are the central complaint. Buyers report discovering after purchase that the AI models they wanted require credits. This is a pricing-transparency problem rather than a software fault, and it is the issue most likely to affect a new buyer.
  • Functional failures and refund friction are both reported. Recurring themes in the negative reviews are a core AI feature that never completes an export, and refunds that require prolonged argument before being granted. In fairness, the company replies publicly to many of these complaints and, in at least one documented case, granted a full refund after escalation.
  • Unexpected charges have been reported. At least one reviewer reports being charged for a subscription to a product they never ordered after subscribing to a different one. Check your billing statements after purchase.
  • No independent technology press coverage. No first-tier technology publication has reviewed these products. What dominates search results instead is review content published by direct competitors — rival upscaling vendors writing about this brand — and review-styled pages on the company's own domain. Neither is an independent assessment.
  • Self-reported scale figures. The homepage claims more than 7.3 million users across 190-plus countries, figures that are self-reported by the vendor and carried by no independent audit. (Based on public information)
  • Renaming complicates research. Because the products were renamed, much of the comparison material online refers to a product line that no longer uses those names, and some of it predates significant model changes.
  • Enhancement is inference, not recovery. No upscaler restores detail that was never recorded. On badly degraded sources the output is a plausible reconstruction, which matters if the footage is evidentiary, historical or archival.

FAQ

Q1. Is HitPaw one program or many?

Many. It is a brand covering at least seven separately licensed products spanning video, photo and audio. Buying one does not give access to the others, which is the most common misunderstanding for new buyers.

Q2. Who makes HitPaw?

HitPaw CO., LIMITED, a company registered in Hong Kong, as stated in the privacy policy and confirmed by the App Store publisher record. It is not part of the larger Chinese software group it is sometimes assumed to belong to; no first-hand evidence supports that association.

Q3. Why can't I find HitPaw Video Enhancer any more?

It was renamed VikPea. The photo enhancer is now FotorPea, the voice changer VoicePea, and the converter Univd. Older reviews and directory entries still use the previous names.

Q4. How much does it cost?

Each product is priced separately, with monthly, yearly and perpetual options. The video enhancer was recently listed near $54 per year or $88 perpetual, with other tools ranging from roughly $16 to $50. Every price is discounted from a higher list price, and further codes are usually available, so treat the checkout total as the only real figure.

Q5. Do I need credits on top of paying for the software?

Possibly, and this is the point to verify before buying. Buyers report that certain AI models consume a credit balance separate from the licence, and that this was not clear at the time of purchase. Confirm it for the specific feature you need.

Q6. Why does Trustpilot not show a rating?

Because Trustpilot suppressed it for a breach of platform guidelines, and stated that it removed a number of fake reviews for the company. The reviews themselves remain readable, and reading the negative ones is more informative than any score would have been.

Q7. Does it work offline?

The desktop applications process locally, which is one of their genuine advantages for large files and private material. Online versions and some newer AI models are cloud-dependent, so the answer varies by product and by feature.

Q8. How good is the output quality?

It depends almost entirely on the source. Mildly soft or low-resolution material tends to improve convincingly; heavily degraded material produces reconstruction that can look artificial. Because no independent technical benchmarking exists for these products, the only reliable evaluation is testing the trial on your own files.

Q9. Is it safe to use with private photos and videos?

The privacy policy is detailed, names a Hong Kong data controller and, on the compliance side the privacy policy states that an EU representative has been appointed under the GDPR, with a dedicated contact address. It also has specific sections for minors' data and regional rights. For genuinely sensitive material, prefer the desktop applications that process locally over browser-based tools.

Q10. Should I buy the subscription or the perpetual licence?

For a single defined project, the perpetual licence for one product is usually the better value and removes recurring-charge risk, which given the reports of unexpected charges is a meaningful consideration. For ongoing work across several products, price the combination carefully — at that point a general-purpose editing suite may be cheaper than three or four separate licences.


Verified against the company's public pages, its store, the Apple App Store records and its Trustpilot profile in August 2026. Pricing on this brand's store is promotional and changes frequently; confirm the current figure at checkout.

Know a Similar Tool?
If you know other great AI tools, feel free to submit them to us