Vizard.ai is a browser workspace from Vizard, Corp. that transcribes a long recording, picks the moments worth posting, reframes them vertically and adds captions. Credits are charged per uploaded minute rather than per clip, and the same account also reaches iOS, Android and a REST API.
Vizard.ai is a browser-based AI video clipping tool that takes one long recording and returns short vertical clips sized for TikTok, Instagram and YouTube Shorts. Its operator calls it a web-based solution for video content repurposing aimed at content marketers, and the company behind it is Vizard, Corp., described on its own about page as founded in Delaware, USA and specialising in AI-driven video tools for content creation.
The name is shared with a Python-based virtual reality research platform from a different vendor on a different domain, so it is worth pinning down which product this is. An independent AI tool directory that lists this slug resolves it to the same company and calls it an AI-powered video editing and clipping tool for repurposing long-form videos. What sits behind that label is narrower than "AI video editor" suggests: it reads a transcript, picks the passages that stand alone, and packages them.
The transcript is the spine of this product, and almost every feature is a different way of acting on it.
A run through the product is short, and the decisions that matter come before the upload.
Video repurposing works here when the source is treated as raw material. The model will not generate clips if the recording lacks sufficient content, so clean a recording with long silences or poor audio before upload, and settle the duration target and any prompt first: running the same file twice costs credits twice.
The product is organised around recordings that already exist and contain speech.
The content named as working well — podcasts, webinars, educational videos, commentaries, interviews and speeches — is a list of talking formats, which is the clearest statement of what does not fit.
The site addresses four buyer groups: creators and podcasters, coaches and business owners, marketing teams, and agencies or freelancers. The real dividing line between tiers, though, is the workspace.
It fits badly where the footage has no dialogue, where a timeline suite is needed for original production, or where the buyer wants a refund window that survives trying the product. The terms also require users to be at least 13 years of age.
Three surfaces exist, and they are not equivalent: a browser workspace, a pair of phone apps, and a REST API.
| Surface | Access conditions |
|---|---|
| Browser workspace | Primary surface; trial run without signing up |
| iOS app | No purchase price, 4+ age rating, minimum iOS version 15 |
| Android app | In-app purchases, Everyone content rating, install band labelled 100K+ |
| REST API | Included in the paid plans, no separate subscription |
All four are published under the name Vizard, Corp. The iOS listing reports 724 ratings at an average of about 4.8 on an app first released in mid-2025, while the Android listing shows an aggregate of 4.4 — two store populations, so neither describes the product as a whole. The header and ratings-block counts disagreed within that Android capture, so neither is quoted.
The documentation states ceilings of 600 minutes of video length, 10GB file size and 4K resolution, and submissions draw down the same upload minutes the web interface uses, not a separate quota. Two prebuilt routes sit beside the raw endpoints: an importable n8n workflow template configured with an API token, and a skill package that adds clipping and social publishing to agent-style coding environments. Rate limits are where the figures stop lining up: the documentation states one pair for long-video submission, three requests per minute and twenty per hour, while the plan comparison table lists three limits, one per tier.
The help centre publishes two lists, one for transcription and a longer one for subtitle translation, with simplified and traditional Chinese, Japanese, Korean, French, German, Russian, Spanish and Portuguese on the transcription list. The headline counts disagree: the API page states over 30 languages, a product page claims 50+ for auto-subtitles and 180+ for translations, and the homepage editor section states over 100 languages.
Credits are charged on what goes in, not on what comes out, which is the single most important thing to understand before comparing tiers. One credit equals one minute of uploaded video, and every uploaded minute costs a credit whether it yields ten clips or none at all.
| Dimension | Free | Mid tier | Top tier |
|---|---|---|---|
| Monthly credits | 60 | From 600 | From 600 |
| Upload video length | 60 mins | 600 mins | 600 mins |
| Upload video size | 1GB | 30GB | 30GB |
| Upload quality | 1080p | 4K | 4K |
| Export quality | 720p | 4K | 4K |
| Export length | 10 minutes | Any length | Any length |
| Video storage | 3 days | 100GB | While subscribed |
| Social accounts | 1 | 6 | 20 |
| Transcript download | TXT | TXT, SRT | TXT, SRT |
Per-plan amounts come from a client-side pricing call that did not return with the page in this capture, so no monthly or annual figure is quoted.
Monthly upload minutes renew each month and accumulate into the next rather than expiring at the cycle boundary. Both paid plans renew automatically unless terminated, at which point the card on file is charged; a plan can be cancelled at any time from account settings and then runs to the end of the current cycle. Single-month subscribers are warned to cancel before the next cycle begins, because an extra charge can affect refund eligibility. Payments run through Stripe, which the operator says leaves it without access to card data.
Refunds are the tightest commercial term here: eligibility covers a billing error, or a request made within 7 days of purchase for services that are still unused — and uploading data counts as using the service. Otherwise requests may carry processing fees deducted from the amount returned, and approved refunds are processed within 5-10 business days. There is no published non-profit rate; organisations send a request from an organisation email and wait for verification.
On the third-party review page checked here, four reviewers describe the same money-side friction: leftover credits not refunded after cancellation, a money-back promise that applies only if the service was never used, and rollover that effectively requires staying subscribed. Those are individual accounts, not a measured sample.
Every AI clip generator here makes the same promise, so the useful comparison is measured reception and the billing unit, not the feature list.
On one third-party consumer review platform, where scores are collected the same way for everyone, this product's profile shows 2,520 reviews at 4.7. Competing clip generators there carry their own numbers: OpusClip 4.0 from 492 reviews, Klap 3.5 from 45 reviews and Submagic 4.5 from 839 reviews. Broader editing suites sit nearby with different profiles, including VEED at 4.2 from about 4,000 reviews and Descript at 2.7 from 286 reviews. The sample sizes are not equal in weight, and none can be averaged with a store rating measuring a different population. The operator also publishes head-to-head pages naming seven competing products, which shows which tools it treats as substitutes even though those pages are written by an interested party.
What separates the category is what gets metered: billing per uploaded minute rewards short sources and punishes long archives, however many clips come back.
The honest boundary of this product is that clip output is conditional on the audio, not guaranteed by the plan.
The service is supplied as is and as available, with no warranty that it will be uninterrupted, timely, secure or error-free and none as to the results obtained from it. To the maximum extent permitted by applicable law, aggregate liability is capped at fifty US dollars (USD $50) or the local equivalent, and that cap stands even where it does not compensate the user. Rights clearance sits with the user, who confirms when providing material that they are legally allowed to do so and are not infringing statutory provisions or third-party rights; the copyright guidance adds that videos may not be downloaded from YouTube unless an official download option exists or the creator has given permission, and that fair use, assessed case by case, does not guarantee protection.
One caveat: the third-party profile showing 4.7 across 2,520 reviews records only 8 reviews in the last 12 months, notes the company has not recently invited customers to review it, and flags that it has not replied to negative reviews.
Two clauses in the terms decide what happens to footage after it is uploaded, and they pull in different directions. Uploading grants a nonexclusive, perpetual, irrevocable, royalty-free, worldwide, transferable and sub-licensable licence to host, reproduce, transmit and display the material, limited by the same sentence to operating and maintaining the site. Separately, the terms state the service may be implemented using machine learning while processing user-provided content, and that nothing in them prohibits the company from using it to tune, validate or otherwise enhance the models underlying the service. Across the pages checked for this entry the privacy policy does not say whether uploaded video is used to train models, so that clause reserves the right rather than disclaiming it.
Three details deserve attention. Account deletion runs through a contact request, but once the retention period expires the rights of access, erasure, rectification and portability can no longer be enforced. One paragraph states that personally identifiable information will not be shared with third parties and that no information will be shared with unaffiliated third parties, in the same breath as permitting sharing with service providers bound to consistent policies. And session-replay and heatmap analytics are disclosed, with that data used for advertising as well as optimisation, while the Android data safety block declares no data shared with third parties and encryption in transit.
Yes, and it is permanent rather than a trial. The free plan provides 60 credits of uploads, but exports carry a watermark, run at 720p and 10 minutes, and each project expires after 3 days.
By upload length, not by output. One credit equals one minute of uploaded video, whatever comes back, and unused monthly minutes carry into the next month.
Only narrowly: refunds cover a billing error, or a request within 7 days of purchase for services still unused, and uploading data already counts as using the service.
The plan comparison table caps uploads at 1GB and 1080p on the free tier and 30GB and 4K on both paid tiers, while the API documentation states 600 minutes, 10GB and 4K — two official pages disagreeing on file size.
